Hepler Broom, LLC
Menu

Category Archives: Class Actions

Standing in Data-Breach Cases – Risk of Future Injury Remains Unsettled: SCOTUS Skirts Apparent Circuit Conflict

February 20, 2018

Today the U.S. Supreme Court denied a cert petition in a matter aimed at resolving whether a plaintiff who alleges a substantial risk of harm in the future has standing under Article III of the Constitution. A ruling in the case, CareFirst v. Attias, would have had major implications for data-breach litigation and in class […]

This entry was posted in Civil Litigation, Class Actions, U.S. Supreme Court and tagged , , on by Unavailable.

Unavailable
Email this Post

Illinois District Court Applies Bristol-Myers to Class Actions as well as Mass Tort Cases

February 20, 2018

In a recent decision, the Northern District of Illinois held the U.S. Supreme Court’s seminal decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, 137 S. Ct. 1773 (2017) applied to jurisdiction determinations in class actions. In so holding, the court in DeBernardis v. NBTY, Inc. No. 1:17-cv-06125 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 18, 2018) placed […]

This entry was posted in Civil Litigation, Class Actions and tagged on by Unavailable.

Unavailable
Email this Post

Spokeo Speak: SCOTUS Addresses Injury-in-Fact Standing in Spokeo

May 23, 2016

A Meaningful Class Action Defense Tool? On May 16, 2016 the High Court finally spoke on Spokeo, the long anticipated case involving what injury is necessary to sustain Article III standing in federal court.  Some predicted a blow to consumer protection and privacy related class actions in which neither the class representative nor the class […]

This entry was posted in Civil Procedure, Class Actions, U.S. Supreme Court on by Glenn Davis.

Glenn Davis
Email this Post

The Eighth Circuit Sends a Bad Message on Unsolicited Faxes

May 11, 2016

Class Certification of TCPA Claims in Sandusky Wellness Center, LLC v. MedTox Scientific, Inc. Alexander Bain, a Scotsman, worked on an experimental fax machine in the 1840’s, synchronizing the movement of two pendulums through a clock to scan messages on a line by line basis. Bain’s work resulted in a patent issued May 27, 1843 […]

This entry was posted in Class Actions and tagged on by Glenn Davis.

Glenn Davis
Email this Post

Waiting For More Dough: The Eastern District of Missouri Rules that an Offer of Judgment Does Not Moot a Class Action

November 19, 2015

Panera Bread Company is, quite obviously, in the bread business. But when Mark Boswell and others filed a class action against the company for breach of contract and fraud, the case was about a different kind of dough. Boswell and the other named plaintiffs had served as Joint Venture General Managers for Panera, managing the […]

This entry was posted in Civil Litigation, Class Actions and tagged , , , on by Charles Insler.

Charles Insler
Email this Post

Seventh Circuit Rejects Class Plaintiff’s Attempt to Avoid CAFA Removal by Limiting Damages Sought in Complaint

April 23, 2014

On April 9, 2014, the Seventh Circuit issued its opinion in Johnson v. Pushpin Holdings, LLC, No. 14-8006 (7th Cir. April 9, 2014). In Pushpin, the Seventh Circuit held that before a class is certified, a statement by the named plaintiff in the complaint does not limit the amount of potential damages that the class […]

This entry was posted in Civil Procedure, Class Actions, Illinois Consumer Fraud Act on by Elizabeth Kellett.

Elizabeth Kellett
Email this Post

HeplerBroom LLC Helps Secure Dismissal of Corporate Officers in Securities Class Action

April 10, 2014

On March 18, 2014, District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr. issued a Memorandum and Order dismissing the former Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Patriot Coal Corporation in a stock drop securities class action filed in the Eastern District of Missouri.   Glenn E. Davis, Partner in HeplerBroom LLC’s St. Louis office assisted Sidley […]

This entry was posted in Business Transactions, Class Actions on by Katie Jacobi.

Katie Jacobi
Email this Post

SCOTUS Washes Out Manufacturers’ Challenge to Consumer Class Actions

March 3, 2014

Supreme Court Refuses to Review Consumer Appliance Defect Class Actions Critics of the Supreme Court as consistently “pro-business” welcomed the Court’s February 24, 2014 order denying certiorari in a series of consumer class action cases alleging defects in millions of front loading washing machines.  A pair of recent Sixth Circuit and Seventh Circuit decisions, and […]

This entry was posted in Class Actions, Commercial Litigation on by Glenn Davis.

Glenn Davis
Email this Post

COMMERCIAL CLEANING FRANCHISOR SWEEPS UP RICO CLAIMS — Arbitration Provision and Class-Action Waiver Clause Valid and Enforceable by Nonsignatories

February 4, 2014

Stratus Building Solutions faced a business challenge on a bet the company scale.  Despite winning many franchise awards, five franchisees charged that its entire system imposed a fraud on franchisees.   The plaintiffs sued 179 defendants, including the system franchisor, master (regional) franchisors, and over 70 individuals associated with the franchise system of violating §§ 1962(c) […]

This entry was posted in Business Transactions, Class Actions, Commercial Litigation on by Glenn Davis.

Glenn Davis
Email this Post

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Reverses Class Certification for Failure of the District Court to Perform a Rigorous Analysis Before Finding Predominance

January 28, 2014

In Parko, et al. v. Shell Oil Co. et al., Nos. 13-8023 & 8024 (7th Cir. Jan. 17, 2014), Judge Posner of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently reversed an order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois granting class certification to a group of plaintiffs […]

This entry was posted in Class Actions on by Beth Bauer.

Beth Bauer
Email this Post

COVID-19 Updates

HeplerBroom is pleased to announce that its physical offices have reopened. While the health and safety of our clients, employees, and families, remain our top priority, HeplerBroom attorneys and staff are returning to our offices on full-time or modified schedules. Our offices are open to visitors and clients with scheduled appointments, with appropriate screening of visitors and social-distancing protocols. HeplerBroom will continue to follow CDC recommendations for cleaning and sanitizing.

We are very proud of the dedicated efforts of our attorneys and staff to provide great service and work product to our clients during the pandemic. This would not have been possible without the incredible support provided by the HeplerBroom IT Department and other essential personnel who supported our personnel and clients from the office locations while the rest of our teams worked remotely.

If you have questions about visiting our offices, please do not hesitate to contact us. We look forward to seeing you in person again in the near future.