| BLOG
Illinois Supreme Court Affirms No Private Rights of Action Exist Under Illinois Environmental Protection Act’s Tank Program

The Takeaway

The Illinois Supreme Court’s ruling in Rice v. Marathon Petroleum Corporation, et al. emphasized the distinction between legal remedies for protecting the environment (a purview of the government and its agencies) and legal remedies for personal injuries resulting from violations of environmental laws (a common-law function).

Case Background

Rice brought an action for common-law negligence and also alleged liability under the Illinois Environmental Protection Act (Act) and the Illinois Pollution Control Board’s regulations. She sought to recover under strict liability pursuant to the LUST (leaking underground storage tank) provisions of the Act.

The district court granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the counts based on liability under the Act; the appellate court affirmed. The courts found that neither expressed nor implied private rights of action to recover for personal injuries exists in the Act itself or in its LUST sections. Instead, a common-law negligence action was deemed an adequate remedy.

Plaintiff appealed to Illinois’ Supreme Court.

Supreme Court Ruling

The Illinois Supreme Court found that “there is no express private right of action under the LUST Program provisions of the Act.” The Court then examined the factors used to determine if a statute implies a private right of action. Under these factors, implication is appropriate when:

  1. The plaintiff is a member of the class for whose benefit the statute was enacted.
  2. The plaintiff’s injury is one the statute was designed to prevent.
  3. A private right of action is consistent with the underlying purpose of the statute.
  4. Implying a private right of action is necessary to provide an adequate remedy for violations of the statute.

Applying these factors, the Court held that the LUST program under the Act does not imply a private right of action for third parties who allege personal injuries as a result of a release from an underground storage tank. It emphasized that “[t]he purpose of the Act and its associated regulations is to protect the environment and to minimize environmental damage.”

The Court further explained that the LUST Program and its regulations “indicate that the Act, and the LUST Program in particular, was intended to protect resources, not to protect third parties injured by leaking underground storage tanks or to provide them with a cause of action for those personal injuries.”

  • Melissa S. Brown
    Partner

    Since 2014, Melissa S. Brown has developed a robust environmental law practice in which she assists businesses on a wide variety of environmental issues. Clients regularly rely on her to provide counsel on complying with federal and ...

Search Blog

Categories

Archives

Contact

Kerri Forsythe
618.307.1150
Email

Jump to Page

HeplerBroom LLC Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek